Rational Canonical and Jordan Forms
نویسنده
چکیده
Definition 2.1. Suppose p1, . . . , pk are polynomials in F[x] which are not all 0. Set I = 〈p1, . . . , pk〉. Let d denote the monic generator of I. We call d the greatest common divisor of the pi and write d = gcd(p1, . . . , pk). If d = 1, we say that the polynomials p1, . . . , pk is relatively prime. Note that, by definition, there exists polynomials q1, . . . , qk ∈ F[x] such that d = p1q1 + · · · + pkqk. So, if p1, . . . , pk are relatively prime, we can find q1, . . . , qk such that ∑k i=1 piqi = 1. Lemma 2.2. Suppose p, q ∈ F[x] are not both 0. Set d = gcd(p, q). If e|p and e|q, then e|d. Proof. Write d = ap + bq with a, b ∈ F[x]. Then it is obvious.
منابع مشابه
Infinite-dimensional versions of the primary, cyclic and Jordan decompositions
The famous primary and cyclic decomposition theorems along with the tightly related rational and Jordan canonical forms are extended to linear spaces of infinite dimensions with counterexamples showing the scope of extensions.
متن کاملRational Canonical Form
In mathematics, complete classification of structures, such as groups and rings, is often a primary goal. Linear transformations are no exception to this. Certain canonical forms exist to classify linear transformations, therefore creating a unique representative of linear transformations in the same similarity class. Diagonal representation is of course one of the simplest examples of a canoni...
متن کاملNUROP Congress Paper Jordan Canonical Forms of Linear Operators
Any linear transformation can be represented by its matrix representation. In an ideal situation, all linear operators can be represented by a diagonal matrix. However, in the real world, there exist many linear operators that are not diagonalizable. This gives rise to the need for developing a system to provide a beautiful matrix representation for a linear operator that is not diagonalizable....
متن کاملLecture 4: Jordan Canonical Forms
This lecture introduces the Jordan canonical form of a matrix — we prove that every square matrix is equivalent to a (essentially) unique Jordan matrix and we give a method to derive the latter. We also introduce the notion of minimal polynomial and we point out how to obtain it from the Jordan canonical form. Finally, we make an encounter with companion matrices. 1 Jordan form and an applicati...
متن کاملRational Canonical Forms and E cientRepresentations of Hypergeometric TermsS
We propose four multiplicative canonical forms that exhibit the shift structure of a given rational function. These forms in particular allow one to represent a hypergeometric term eeciently. Each of these representations is optimal in some sense.
متن کاملHow to Find Bases for Jordan Canonical Forms
The idea for nding a basis relates to the proof of why a Jordan canonical form exists. What we seek to do is nd a largest possible set of chains (or cycles) of the form {x, (T −λkI)(x), . . . , (T −λkI)(x)} which are linearly independent. By the proof of Jordan canonical form, the number and lengths of these chains can be found from the numbers d0, . . . , d`k . Indeed, let λ = λk be a xed eige...
متن کامل